
The average adult reads non-fiction silently at 238 words per minute, not the 300 that gets quoted everywhere. We traced every figure to its study, added grade and language data, and checked the speed nine blogging tools assume when they print a min read label.
You need one number for a sentence: how fast does the average person read? Search for it and you get a speed reading test, a Reddit thread arguing about 300 words per minute, and a chart on a tutoring site that blends five studies without saying which number came from where.
This page gives you that number with its source, plus the figures writers ask for next: reading speed by grade, by age and by language, how long a given word count takes to read, and the speed your blogging platform assumes when it prints "5 min read". Every figure links to the study it comes from, and we say whether it measured silent reading or reading aloud, because mixing the two is the most common error in this topic.
The average adult reads English non-fiction silently at about 238 words per minute and fiction at about 260. Read aloud, the average drops to about 183 words per minute. These figures come from Marc Brysbaert's 2019 meta-analysis in the Journal of Memory and Language, which pooled 190 studies with 18,573 participants published between 1901 and 2019, and they apply to native speakers aged roughly 18 to 60.
The 238 figure is the plain average across studies. The median study found 235, weighting by participants gives 242, and a model limited to the 87 studies that reported their spread gives 247. However you cut it, the answer lands in the high 230s to high 240s, not at 300.
| Type of reading (English adults) | Average speed | Typical range | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silent, non-fiction | 238 wpm | 175 to 300 wpm | Brysbaert, 2019 |
| Silent, fiction | 260 wpm | 200 to 320 wpm | Brysbaert, 2019 |
| Aloud | 183 wpm | Standard deviation 26 wpm | Brysbaert, 2019 |
| Aloud, short standard texts, 17 languages | 184 wpm | Standard deviation 29 wpm | Trauzettel-Klosinski and Dietz, 2012 |
Why is fiction faster? Brysbaert links speed to word length: non-fiction uses longer words, so each word takes longer. His formula scales the 238 figure by 4.6 divided by the average word length of the text, which means a text full of long technical terms will read slower than the average, and a plain-language novel faster.
For most people, yes. The 300 figure appears on countless pages as "the average", but Brysbaert traces it to small eye-tracking studies, some with as few as 10 university students, and to short timed tests that capture a sprint rather than a reading pace. In his own novel study, only 11 of 48 readers (23%) went faster than 300 words per minute across a whole book.
He calls a 300 words per minute target "unrealistic for the majority of people". If you are quoting an average, use 238 for non-fiction or 260 for fiction, and cite the meta-analysis rather than a speed test vendor.
Not without a cost to understanding. A review of the research in Psychological Science in the Public Interest concluded that there is a trade-off between speed and accuracy, and that readers are unlikely to go from around 250 to 500 to 750 words per minute while understanding as much (Rayner et al., 2016). Speed reading and skimming can give the gist with moderate comprehension, which is fine for triage and poor for anything you need to remember.
The authors' route to reading faster without losing comprehension is less exciting: practice, and a larger vocabulary. A reader who knows more words recognizes them faster.
Children's reading speed is measured two ways, and the numbers are not interchangeable. Schools mostly measure oral reading fluency: words read correctly aloud in one minute. Researchers studying silent reading use eye-movement recordings. Oral rates run lower than silent rates at the same age, so check which one a chart shows before you quote it.
These are the 50th percentile scores from Hasbrouck and Tindal's 2017 compiled norms, drawn from 6,886,582 oral reading scores on three widely used US assessments. The unit is words correct per minute (WCPM) on an unpracticed passage read aloud for one minute.
| Grade | Fall | Winter | Spring |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not measured | 29 | 60 |
| 2 | 50 | 84 | 100 |
| 3 | 83 | 97 | 112 |
| 4 | 94 | 120 | 133 |
| 5 | 121 | 133 | 146 |
| 6 | 132 | 145 | 146 |
Source: Hasbrouck and Tindal (2017), Technical Report 1702, University of Oregon.
So how many words per minute should a fifth grader read? By this measure, a typical fifth grader reads about 121 WCPM aloud in the fall and 146 by spring. These are medians: half of students read slower, and a single score below them is a prompt to look closer, not a diagnosis.
The national picture matches. In the 2018 NAEP Oral Reading Fluency Study, a nationally representative sample of more than 1,800 US fourth graders averaged 120 WCPM. Speed tracked reading level closely:
| NAEP reading level (grade 4) | Average WCPM |
|---|---|
| Advanced | 160 |
| Proficient | 142 |
| Basic | 123 |
| Below Basic (high) | 108 |
| Below Basic (medium) | 95 |
| Below Basic (low) | 71 |
Source: NCES, Highlights of the 2018 NAEP Oral Reading Fluency Study (2021).
The most uncomfortable finding in this topic comes from a 2016 study in Reading Research Quarterly. Researchers recorded the eye movements of 2,009 US students in 16 states as they read grade-level passages silently, counted only readings with at least 70% comprehension, and compared the speeds with a large 1960 study that used the same method.
| Grade | Silent speed, 2011 | Silent speed, 1960 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 115 wpm | 115 wpm | 0 |
| 4 | 147 wpm | 158 wpm | 11 slower |
| 6 | 165 wpm | 185 wpm | 20 slower |
| 8 | 166 wpm | 204 wpm | 38 slower |
| 10 | 185 wpm | 224 wpm (estimated) | 39 slower |
| 12 (1960: grade 11) | 192 wpm | 237 wpm | 45 slower |
Source: Spichtig et al. (2016), Reading Research Quarterly 51(2). The 1960 figures are from Taylor's studies as reported in this paper; the grade 10 figure for 1960 is the authors' estimate.
Two details make this worth reading carefully before you quote it. The gap opens after grade 2 and widens every year, and between grades 6 and 8 the 2011 students gained just 1 word per minute against 17 in 1960. The sample also skewed toward stronger readers (67% scored in the top two quartiles on state tests), so if anything the true average may be lower.
Adult reading speed is stable for decades and slows only gently in later life. In a study of 645 people aged 8 to 81 reading short sentences aloud on a standard eye-clinic chart, maximum reading speed rose from 137 words per minute at age 8 to 202 at 16, held at about 200 until 40, then declined gradually to about 175 by 81 (Calabrèse et al., 2016). The authors describe the effect of age as weak.
| Age | Maximum reading speed (aloud, short sentences) |
|---|---|
| 8 | 137 wpm |
| 16 | 202 wpm |
| 16 to 40 | About 200 wpm |
| 81 | About 175 wpm |
Source: Calabrèse et al. (2016), Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.
Brysbaert's review reaches the same shape for silent reading: the adult averages hold from about 18 to 60, with slower reading expected from about 60 to 65 onward. Reading in a second language is slower too; one study in his review measured a 17% drop.
Words per minute is a poor unit for comparing languages, because languages pack meaning into words differently. A language that needs more words to say the same thing shows a higher words per minute figure without its readers being any faster. With that warning, here are the averages Brysbaert compiled:
| Language | Silent (wpm) | Aloud (wpm) |
|---|---|---|
| Italian | 285 | 182 |
| Spanish | 278 | 191 |
| German | 260 | 169 |
| Chinese | 260 | 152 |
| English | 236 | 190 |
| Dutch | 228 | 171 |
| Korean | 226 | 133 |
| Hebrew | 224 | 147 |
| Swedish | 218 | 163 |
| French | 214 | 180 |
| Finnish | 195 | 162 |
| Arabic | 181 | 142 |
Source: Brysbaert (2019). Chinese is converted from characters at 1.5 characters per word. The English silent figure here (236) comes from the language comparison and differs slightly from the 238 headline figure.
No, not in speed. A meta-analysis of 33 studies from 2008 to 2018 found no reliable difference in reading time between screens and paper across 14 studies with 1,233 participants (Clinton, 2019). Brysbaert reports the same: reading times are very similar, apart from early studies on low-quality screens.
Comprehension is a different story. The same meta-analysis found readers understood informational texts somewhat better on paper, while stories showed almost no gap. If your point is about speed, screens are not the problem.
At the average silent speed of 238 words per minute, 1,000 words of non-fiction takes about 4 minutes, and 2,000 words takes about 8 and a half. The table covers common lengths at the non-fiction, fiction and read-aloud averages. Use the read-aloud column for scripts read word for word; for live speeches and presentations, our study of 601 TED talks puts the typical pace at 154 words per minute.
| Words | Non-fiction, silent (238 wpm) | Fiction, silent (260 wpm) | Aloud (183 wpm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | 1 min 16 s | 1 min 9 s | 1 min 38 s |
| 500 | 2 min 6 s | 1 min 55 s | 2 min 44 s |
| 750 | 3 min 9 s | 2 min 53 s | 4 min 6 s |
| 1,000 | 4 min 12 s | 3 min 51 s | 5 min 28 s |
| 1,500 | 6 min 18 s | 5 min 46 s | 8 min 12 s |
| 2,000 | 8 min 24 s | 7 min 42 s | 10 min 56 s |
| 2,500 | 10 min 30 s | 9 min 37 s | 13 min 40 s |
| 3,000 | 12 min 36 s | 11 min 32 s | 16 min 24 s |
| 4,000 | 16 min 48 s | 15 min 23 s | 21 min 51 s |
| 5,000 | 21 min 1 s | 19 min 14 s | 27 min 19 s |
| 10,000 | 42 min 1 s | 38 min 28 s | 54 min 39 s |
| 20,000 | 1 h 24 min | 1 h 16 min | 1 h 49 min |
Our calculation from the averages in Brysbaert (2019). For context, the median page ranking in Google's top 10 is 997 words in our study of 1,593 top-ranking pages, which is just over 4 minutes of reading at the average pace.
A whole novel is a bigger commitment than people guess. The books in Brysbaert's reading study averaged 107,000 words; at 260 words per minute, that is about 6 hours 51 minutes of reading.
At 238 words per minute, an average adult reads about 48 pages an hour of a book with 300 words per page. Words per page vary a lot with font, trim size and layout, so the answer depends on the book. Count the words on one full page, then use the table.
| Words per page | Pages per hour (238 wpm) | Time for 100 pages |
|---|---|---|
| 250 | 57 | 1 h 45 min |
| 300 | 48 | 2 h 6 min |
| 400 | 36 | 2 h 48 min |
Our calculation. The words per page values are examples to pick from, not measured averages.
Fewer tools than you'd think use the research average. We opened the source code of nine widely used blogging tools on 27 October 2026 and found the reading speed each one plugs into its "X min read" estimate. The constants run from 189 to 275 words per minute.
| Tool | Words per minute (English) | Extra rules |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress block editor, Time to Read block | 189 | Site owners can change it |
| npm reading-time package | 200 | Counts each Chinese, Japanese or Korean character as a word |
| Docusaurus blog | 200 | Language-aware word counting |
| Hugo | 212 | 500 per minute for Chinese, Japanese and Korean pages; rounds up |
| Yoast SEO | 228 | Separate rates for 16 languages; adds 12 seconds per image |
| Gatsby (remark plugin) | 265 | Converts Chinese and Japanese characters to words |
| Ghost | 275 | Adds 12 seconds for the first image, 1 second less for each next one, at least 3 |
| DEV (Forem) | 275 | None |
| BestWebsiteTemplate.com (this site) | 200 | None |
Sources: Gutenberg, reading-time, Docusaurus, Hugo, Yoast SEO, Gatsby, Ghost, Forem. Code checked 27 October 2026.
What this means in practice: the same 2,000-word post shows about 11 minutes on a WordPress block (at 189) and about 7 on Ghost or DEV (at 275). Neither is wrong for every reader, but they describe very different readers. The research average of 238 sits in the middle.
Yoast's code names its source, the 2012 IReST study. That study timed people reading aloud, so Yoast's rates describe reading aloud rather than silent reading. Its English rate of 228 still lands close to the silent average of 238. Medium also publishes a read time method in its help center, but its page blocked our checks, so we left it out rather than quote it second-hand.
Our own labels assume 200 words per minute, slower than the research average. That makes our times slightly generous for an average adult reader and closer to the truth for people reading in a second language.
Every statistic on this page comes from the primary source linked beside it: peer-reviewed papers, a university technical report, and the US National Center for Education Statistics. Where we could only read a paper's abstract (Rayner et al., Trauzettel-Klosinski and Dietz, Clinton), we quote only what the abstract states. We label each figure as silent or aloud, and as words per minute or words correct per minute, because these measure different things.
The reading time and pages per hour tables are our arithmetic on the published averages. The "min read" table comes from reading each tool's current source code on 27 October 2026; constants can change in later versions.
You are welcome to use any figure or table here. Please credit BestWebsiteTemplate.com and link to this page, and for the research figures, cite the original study we link as well. For the "min read" comparison, which is our own analysis, a credit and link to this page is enough.




